Former Employees of Marathon Ashland Pipeline, LLC v. Chao

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that Labor is required to provide an explanation of the investigation undertaken
• finding that Labor is required to provide an explanation of the investigation undertaken
• noting that even if “Marathon Ashland did not serve [its parent company’s] currently certified facilities, Marathon Ashland still may have served its parent company’s other production facilities whose workers independently meet the statutory criteria”
• Labor Department’s reliance on employer’s conclusory assertions concerning “production” constituted impermissible abdication of agency’s responsibility to interpret TAA statute and to define terms used in it
• referring to an earlier version of the Trade Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).