Former Employees of Marathon Ashland Pipe Line LLC v. Elaine Chao, Secretary of Labor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• expressing confusion about deference to an implicit interpretation because \it is not entirely clear what it is that the government wishes us to defer to\
• “[Labor] is entitled to base an adjustment assistance eligibility determination on statements from company officials if [Labor] reasonably concludes that those statements are creditworthy and are not contradicted by other evidence.”
• “The Secretary is entitled to base an adjustment assistance eligibility determination on statements from company officials,” but only “if the Secretary reasonably concludes that those statements are creditworthy and are not contradicted by other evidence.”
• referring to Labor Department’s “fact-intensive determination” in TAA investigation
• referring to an earlier version of the Trade Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).