Former Employees of Hollister, Inc. v. United States Department of Labor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding Interior Board of Land Appeals’ (“IBLA”) finding that claims were invalid where Board properly relied on testimony of Forest Service expert mineral examiners and mineral reports, and Government presented economic evidence that the exposed quartz was not a valuable mineral discovery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).