Skip to main content
· 2/10/2004

Former Employees of Barry Callebaut v. Elaine Chao, Secretary of Labor

Citations

  • 357 F.3d 1377
  • 25 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 2258
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 2064
  • 2004 WL 235204

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Labor’s findings were supported by substantial evidence including statements from worker’s firm which Labor “deemed creditworthy and that was not contradicted by any other evidence”
  • finding that a statement that an affidavit is signed “subject to punishment” for supplying false information is indicia that the affidavit is sufficiently “trustworthy to constitute substantial evidence”
  • deeming \moot” \the question of the Court of International Trade’s authority to order Labor to certify [workers]” for TAA benefits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lourie, Plager, Clevenger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.