Skip to main content
· 4/22/1991

Forman v. Stevens

Citations

  • 60 Wash. App. 1078
  • 1991 Wash. App. LEXIS 758

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that under the contractual language required by the Holder Rule, “[i]f the cars [buyers] purchased turn out to be lemons and they assert a right to withhold payment against the sellers, they may also assert the same right against the assignees”
  • noting plaintiff 's allegation \the apparentness (or lack thereof) of a violation should be ascertained in light of the knowledge that a reasonable assignee similarly situated to the defendants should have\
  • “[T]he Holder Notice [ ] allow[s] the debtor to raise many claims and defenses against the assignee that he or she may have against the original seller.”
  • “[Section] 1641(a) does not impose a duty of additional inquiry on assignees.”
  • relying on “common industry practices”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.