Skip to main content
· 4/29/1907

Forman v. Sewerage & Water Board

Citations

  • 119 La. 49
  • 43 So. 908
  • 1907 La. LEXIS 434

Syllabus

<p>1. Actions — Creation of Remedy.</p> <p>The language of the following proviso is so plain and unambiguous as to leave no room for interpretation:</p> <p>“Provided, that nothing in this act shall be construed to mean that a right or cause of action is created in favor of said Forman against said board; the intention being to give him the right to enforce any cause of action that he may have, either in law or equity.”</p> <p>2. Statutes — Construction—Title of Act.</p> <p>The title of an act is no part of the act, and can be resorted to for the purpose of interpreting the act only in case of doubt.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — For eases in point, see Cent. Dig. vol. 44, Statutes, § 288.]</p> <p>3. Attorney and Client — Right to Compensation.</p> <p>The right of an attorney at law to demand payment for his services depends upon whether he was or not employed. He cannot recover from one who did not employ him, however valuable the result of his services may have been to such person, and especially if the person was not even a party to the suit.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — For cases in point, see Cent. Dig. vol. 5, Attorney and Client, § 317.]</p> <p>(Syllabus by the Court.)</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • describing how, at the direction of the GRU, defendant “raise[d] both hands in the air with his palms facing the MPD officers at about head height”
  • finding a seizure when 7 a police vehicle “pulled up next to [the defendant], . . . immediately shined a bright flashlight at him, and issued two, successive directives”
  • “By raising both hands in the air after having had his hands in his pockets, Mr. Gibson ‘signal[ed] submission’ to Officer Wright’s orders.” (alteration in original)
  • plaintiff failed to meet her burden of presenting sufficient 27 evidence to show how the alleged impairment limited her functional capacity and even 28 assuming the ALJ ignored evidence of fibromyalgia, any error was harmless.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Provosty

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.