Forida East Coast Co. v. Langston

Citations

• 75 Fla. 725
• 79 So. 77

Syllabus

<p>It was not reversible error for the Chancellor to confirm a sale of land made on the legal siales day in October, 1916, by a Special Master upon the foreclosure of a mortgage on such land, upon objection thereto, upon the ground that such sale was made subject to the taxes due on the land for the years 1914 and 1915, where it appears that the final decree ordering such sale was entered on September 11th, 1915, “nunc pro tunc as of August 1st, A. D. 1915.” Neither was the fact that the property was sold for $13,000.00 a sufficient ground upon whch to refuse a confirmation of the sale in the absence from the record of any proof that the property sold was worth more, and that this amount was a grossly inadequate consideration therefor.</p>