Forester v. Werner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “disregarding” reliance 21 on Vinci and finding that “the federal standing test under AGC has not been clearly applied by the 22 California Supreme Court to claims brought under California’s Cartwright Act”
• “The application of AGC to California state antitrust claims has recently become murky, and that murkiness persuades the Court AGC should not be applied.”
• \Whether the [plaintiffs] will carry their burden of proof on the price-fixing claim is a decidedly different issue from whether they have alleged enough facts under Rule 8 to stay in court.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).