Federal Circuit· 3/14/2019
Forest Laboratories, LLC v. Sigmapharm Laboratories, LLC
Citations
- 918 F.3d 928
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that limitation contained in patent’s dependent claim 4 also applied to patent’s independent claim 1 based on language in the patent’s specification despite the fact that the claim language of claim 1 did not contain the limitation
- affirming sufficient written description based on expert testimony about how a specifi- cation’s disclosure would have been understood in view of what was known in the art
- affirming sufficient written description based on expert testimony about how a specifi- cation’s disclosure would have been understood in view of what was known in the art
- affirming the district court’s construction of a claim term after observing the specification, among other things, “describe[d] the features of the present invention as a whole” and “explained the benefits [thereof] over the prior art” (quotation marks and citation omitted)
- “When a patent describes the features of the ‘present invention’ as a whole, this description limits the scope of the invention.” (cleaned up)
- “An invention is not obvious simply because all of the claimed limitations were known in the prior art at the time of the invention.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Prost, Dyk, Moore
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Apple Inc. v. Wi-Lan Inc.Federal Circuit· 2022-02-04· cited 42×
- Pavo Solutions LLC v. Kingston Technology Company, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2022-06-03· cited 26×
- Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2024-04-01· cited 4×
- Biogen International Gmbh v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.Federal Circuit· 2022-03-16· cited 1×
- Immunogen, Inc. v. StewartFederal Circuit· 2025-03-06
- Taction Technology, Inc. v. Apple Inc.Federal Circuit· 2025-08-13
- America's Best Franchising, Inc. v. Roger AbbottTrademark Trial and Appeal Board· 2013-03-20
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossFederal Circuit· 2006-02-21· cited 3,273×
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Federal Circuit· 1995-04-05· cited 2,940×
- KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court· 2007-04-30· cited 1,310×
- United States v. AdamsSupreme Court· 1966-02-21· cited 544×
- Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Eli Lilly and Co.Federal Circuit· 2010-03-22· cited 436×
- Verizon Services Corp. v. Vonage Holdings Corp.Federal Circuit· 2007-09-26· cited 186×
- Wbip, LLC v. Kohler Co.Federal Circuit· 2016-07-19· cited 184×
- Arctic Cat Inc. v. Bombardier Recreational Products Inc.Federal Circuit· 2017-12-07· cited 164×
- Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. v. Twi Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2014-12-03· cited 146×
- Leo Pharmaceutical Products, Ltd. v. ReaFederal Circuit· 2013-08-12· cited 67×
- In Re Pravin L. Soni, Ceinwen Rowlands, Larry Edwards and Mark WartenbergFederal Circuit· 1995-05-09· cited 62×
- In Re Michael Geisler, Rudolf Kotter-Faulhaber, Susanne Wuerz and Michael JungFederal Circuit· 1997-07-07· cited 54×
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Company v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2014-06-12· cited 52×
- Ultimatepointer, L.L.C. v. Nintendo Co LtdFederal Circuit· 2016-03-01· cited 51×
- Smiths Industries Medical Systems, Inc., as Successor of Intertech Resources Inc. v. Vital Signs, Inc.Federal Circuit· 1999-07-14· cited 50×
- Knoll Pharmaceutical Company, Inc. And the John and Lois Arnold Family Limited Liability Partnership v. Teva Pharmaceuticals Usa, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2004-05-19· cited 47×
- Pozen Inc. v. Par Pharmaceutical, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2012-09-28· cited 34×
- Cardsoft (Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors), LLC v. VeriFone, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2015-12-02· cited 17×
Other cases named Forest Laboratories, LLC v. Sigmapharm Laboratories, LLC
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.