Skip to main content
Federal Circuit· 3/14/2019

Forest Laboratories, LLC v. Sigmapharm Laboratories, LLC

Citations

  • 918 F.3d 928

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that limitation contained in patent’s dependent claim 4 also applied to patent’s independent claim 1 based on language in the patent’s specification despite the fact that the claim language of claim 1 did not contain the limitation
  • affirming sufficient written description based on expert testimony about how a specifi- cation’s disclosure would have been understood in view of what was known in the art
  • affirming sufficient written description based on expert testimony about how a specifi- cation’s disclosure would have been understood in view of what was known in the art
  • affirming the district court’s construction of a claim term after observing the specification, among other things, “describe[d] the features of the present invention as a whole” and “explained the benefits [thereof] over the prior art” (quotation marks and citation omitted)
  • “When a patent describes the features of the ‘present invention’ as a whole, this description limits the scope of the invention.” (cleaned up)
  • “An invention is not obvious simply because all of the claimed limitations were known in the prior art at the time of the invention.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Prost, Dyk, Moore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Forest Laboratories, LLC v. Sigmapharm Laboratories, LLC

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.