Skip to main content
· 1/27/1977

Forest Grove Brick Works, Inc. v. Strickland

Citations

  • 559 P.2d 502
  • 277 Or. 81
  • 1977 Ore. LEXIS 1054

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that federal court decisions on FRCP 56(c) “are of helpful guidance” in interpreting identical Oregon summary judgment statute
  • charging an individual with constructive knowledge in circumstances where there is a duty of undertaking \a reasonably diligent inquiry\ that would provide actual knowledge
  • charging an individual with constructive knowledge in circumstances where there is a duty of undertaking “a reasonably diligent inquiry’ that would provide actual knowledge
  • remanded to determine when plaintiff, in the exercise of reasonable diligence, should have discovered the \fraud\
  • remanded to determine when plaintiff, in the exercise of reasonable diligence, should have discovered the “fraud”
  • “[i]t usually is not feasible to resolve on motion for summary judgment cases involving questions such as when knowledge is discoverable by reasonable diligence of plaintiff’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Denecke, Howell, Lent, Bradshaw

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.