Skip to main content
· 4/17/2017

Forest City Stapleton Inc. v. Rogers

Citations

  • 2017 CO 23
  • 393 P.3d 487
  • 2017 WL 1377345
  • 2017 Colo. LEXIS 281

Syllabus

Implied Warranty of Suitability—Privity of Contract—Implied Warranties. The Supreme Court considered whether privity of contract is necessary for a home buyer to assert a claim for breach of the implied warranty of suitability against a developer. The Court concluded that because breach of the implied warranty of suitability is a contract claim, privity of contract is required in such a case. Here, the home buyer was not in privity of contract with the developer and thus cannot pursue a claim against the developer for breach of the implied warranty of suitability. Accordingly, the Court of Appeals' judgment was reversed and the case was remanded for further proceedings.

Judges: Rice

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.