Foreman v. Jackson Minit Markets, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• summarizing the four different methods of calculating average weekly wage in the predecessor to section 42-1-40
• upholding the full commission’s decision for exceptional reasons to combine an employee’s wages earned concurrently from two separate employers in calculating the average weekly wage under the statutory predecessor to section 42-1-40
• upholding the full commission's decision for exceptional reasons to combine an employee's wages earned concurrently from two separate employers in calculating the average weekly wage under the statutory predecessor to section 42-1-40
• interpreting substantially similar statutes to those of South Dakota and holding the definition of “earnings” did not preclude aggregation of wages because aggregation of wages was the only fair way to compensate employees for lost earning capacity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).