Foreman v. EF Hutton & Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming fees under section 772.104 when the case was disposed of on the pleadings alone
• discussing standard under identically worded attorney's fees provision of section 772.104
• “The legislature’s clear intent in wording section 772.104 as it did was to discourage RICO claims lacking either legal or factual substance by setting a less stringent standard for a fee award than the bad faith standard of section 57.105.”
• “The legislature’s clear intent in wording section 772.104 as it did was to discourage RICO claims lacking either legal or factual substance by setting a less stringent standard for a fee award than the bad faith standard of section 57.105.”
• discussing standard under section 772.104

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).