Foreman v. Anchorage Equal Rights Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the marital status provision was intended to protect unmarried couples
• holding that the marital status provision was intended to protect unmarried couples
• holding unmarried couples are included within the state and municipal prohibitions against discrimination based on marital status
• holding unmarried couples are included within the state and municipal prohibitions against discrimination based on marital status
• prohibition of marital status discrimination includes unmarried couples of the opposite sex
• prohibition of marital status discrimination includes unmarried couples of the opposite sex

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).