Foreback v. Accuspray Application Technologies
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 4676
Syllabus
Motion for summary judgment; de novo; R.C. 4123.85; R.C. 4123.84. Judgment affirmed. We find that R.C. 4123.85 exclusively applies to the plaintiff-appellant's workers' compensation claim seeking benefits for the alleged occupational-disease death of her husband. Because plaintiff-appellant has neither argued nor established that the claim is not precluded by the statute of limitations set forth in R.C. 4123.85, no genuine issue of material fact remains and the Bureau of Workers' Compensation (\BWC\) is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Accordingly, the trial court did not err in granting the BWC's motion for summary judgment.
Judges: Groves
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.