Skip to main content
· 12/15/1994

Ford & Vlahos v. ITT Commercial Finance Corp.

Citations

  • 885 P.2d 877
  • 8 Cal. 4th 1220
  • 36 Cal. Rptr. 2d 464
  • 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9548
  • 25 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 630
  • 94 Daily Journal DAR 17629
  • 1994 Cal. LEXIS 6333

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a prior version of California’s UCC did not “definitively limit[] a secured party’s duty to advertise the sale of collateral merely to placing a legal notice in a newspaper”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mosk

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.