Ford v. Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying categorical approach to determine whether sexual abuse of a minor was an “aggravated felony” and “a crime of child abuse” that made petitioner removable
• noting that issues not raised in petitioner’s brief are abandoned
• considering 2 1 111/112/113 (B.I.A. Aug. 23, 2024), aff’g Nos. A246-265-111/112/113 (Immig. Ct. 2 N.Y.C. Apr. 11, 2024
• “consider[ing] abandoned any claims not adequately presented in an appellant’s brief” (quotation marks omitted)
• “consider[ing] abandoned any claims not adequately presented in an appellant’s brief” (quotation marks omitted)
• “We consider abandoned any claims not adequately presented in an appellant’s brief, and an appellant’s failure to make legal or factual arguments constitutes abandonment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).