Skip to main content
· 11/21/2001

Ford v. Student Loan Guarantee Foundation of Arkansas (In Re Ford)

Citations

  • 269 B.R. 673
  • 2001 Bankr. LEXIS 1482
  • 2001 WL 1474464

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that debtor’s worsening arthritic condition will decrease future ability to work and increase medical costs
  • finding that debtor’s worsening arthritic condition will decrease future ability to work and increase medical costs
  • asserting that debt- or’s age and physical condition weighed heavily toward discharging student loan, while debtor’s failure to pursue deferments or opt for ICRP did not support a finding of nondischargeability
  • debtor’s age and physical condition weighed “heavily in favor of discharging the student loans”
  • “... given the unlikelihood that the Debt- or will ever make more money than she does right now, this would result in her carrying around a very large and ever-increasing debt until it is forgiven when she is 87 years old.”
  • stating the standard of review in nearly identical terms

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Koger, Kressel, Dreher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.