Ford v. State of New York

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• implying that spontaneous recall is under normal conditions an accurate indicator of trustworthiness
• overruling Ohio v. Roberts, 448 U.S. 56, 100 S.Ct. 2531, 65 L.Ed.2d 597 (1980)
• “The Confrontation Clause ... bars the admission of some evidence that would otherwise be admissible under an exception to the hearsay rule”
• \Reliability can be inferred without more in a case where the evidence falls within a firmly rooted hearsay exception\
• persons making statements under \medical treatment\ exception to hearsay rule \are highly unlikely to lie\
• statement made between 15 and 45 minutes after an accident could not qualify an admission under the present sense impression exception

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).