Supreme Court of Arkansas· 10/1/1998
Ford v. State
Citations
- 976 S.W.2d 915
- 334 Ark. 385
- 1998 Ark. LEXIS 515
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Deliberation has been defined as ‘weighing in the mind of the consequences of a course of conduct, as distinguished from acting upon a sudden impulse without the exercise of reasoning powers.’”
- “Deliberation has been defined as ‘weighing in the mind of the consequences of a course of conduct, as distinguished from acting upon a sudden impulse without the exercise of reasoning powers.’”
- “Deliberation has been defined as “weighing in the mind of the consequences of a course of conduct, as distinguished from acting upon a sudden impulse without the exercise of reasoning powers.’ ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Newbern
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Thornton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2014-04-10· cited 34×
- O'NEAL v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2004-04-08· cited 27×
- Clay Anthony Ford v. Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas Department of CorrectionEighth Circuit· 2004-04-14· cited 9×
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2009-01-30· cited 8×
- Daniels v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2008-05-29· cited 8×
- Clay Anthony Ford v. Larry NorrisEighth Circuit· 2004-04-14
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.