Skip to main content

Ford v. State

Citations

  • 509 S.W.2d 317
  • 1974 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1669

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that eyewitness identification of a defendant was sufficient to support his conviction despite alibi testimony that the jury was free to reject
  • holding that positive identification of a defendant was sufficient to support his conviction despite alibi testimony that the jury was free to reject
  • holding that son's identification of appellant as person who shot son's father was sufficient to support murder conviction
  • holding positive identification of appellant was sufficient to support his conviction despite alibi testimony
  • “The positive identification of appellant as the [killer] is sufficient to support his conviction.”
  • “The positive identification of appellant as the [killer] is sufficient to support his conviction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Roberts

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.