Ford v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding remand for resentencing was required on ground that appellate court could not discern from the record whether predicate convictions were truly sequential as resulting from separate sentencing proceedings
• holding three previous convictions insufficient because \there were two different dates of adjudication\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Richardson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-01-14· cited 57×
• Cook v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-02-16· cited 2×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Bover v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2001-10-04· cited 119×
• Wilson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-04-03· cited 1×