Supreme Court of South Carolina· 3/21/1994
Ford v. State
Citations
- 442 S.E.2d 604
- 314 S.C. 245
- 1994 S.C. LEXIS 64
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that counsels rejection of an alibi charge when the defendant claims that he was in another place at the time of the commission of the criminal act constitutes deficient representation under an objective standard of reasonableness
- holding respondent failed to prove prejudice from trial counsel’s fail ure to request an alibi charge where there was overwhelming evidence of guilt
- failure to seek alibi charge not prejudicial in light of overwhelming evidence of guilt
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Chandler, Finney, Harwell, Moore, Toal
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Smalls v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2018-02-07· cited 93×
- Commonwealth v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2019-07-17· cited 30×
- Skakel v. Comm'r of Corr.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2018-05-04· cited 27×
- Roseboro v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1995-01-23· cited 18×
- Gibbs v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2013-05-15· cited 17×
- Maurice Hope v. Warden CartledgeFourth Circuit· 2017-05-22· cited 13×
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2003-07-21· cited 12×
- Harris v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2008-03-10· cited 6×
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.