Skip to main content

Ford v. Henderson

Citations

  • 691 P.2d 754
  • 1984 Colo. App. LEXIS 1249

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming a trial court’s conclusion that a party’s reliance upon the postal service to timely deliver mail does not constitute excusable neglect

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Berman, Sternberg, Babcock

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.