Skip to main content

Ford v. Grizzle

Citations

  • 398 Ill. App. 3d 639
  • 338 Ill. Dec. 325
  • 924 N.E.2d 531
  • 2010 Ill. App. LEXIS 109

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that evidence is relevant “if it has any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action more or less probable than it would be without the evidence”
  • “It is the function of the trial court to determine the admissibility and relevance of evidence, and its ruling will not be disturbed absent an abuse of discretion.”
  • “It is the function of the trial court to determine the admissibility and relevance of evidence, and its ruling will not be disturbed absent an abuse of discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Welch, Chapman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Ford v. Grizzle

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.