Ford v. Ford

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• higher income families spend less and less on \`needs'\ and put more and more into savings or investments

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Maturo v. Maturo
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-05-04· cited 65×
• State v. Albino
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2011-08-23· cited 24×
• DIVISION OF CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT/SMITH v. Neal
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1997-01-08· cited 2×
• DCSE/VANN v. Rivers
  Delaware Family Court· 1997-10-15

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Levitt v. Bouvier
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1972-01-04· cited 265×
• Fiduciary Trust Co. v. Fiduciary Trust Co.
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1982-04-20· cited 70×
• Kenton v. Kenton
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1990-03-22· cited 47×
• Dalton v. Clanton
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1989-04-06· cited 16×
• Turner v. Turner
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1991-02-19· cited 10×
• Shuba v. Division of Child Support Enforcement Ex Rel. Reese
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1989-08-16· cited 3×