Ford v. Ford

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[I]ncome to the child in her own right is intended to provide additional support due to the child’s special needs and should not serve as a basis to reduce the parents’ obligation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Department of Revenue Ex Rel. Shirer v. Shirer
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-08-17· cited 4×
• Baum v. Baum
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-12-06· cited 1×
• Hunt v. Hunt
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-04-30

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Wallace v. DEPT. OF REV. EX REL. CUTTER
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-12-22· cited 14×
• Williams v. Williams
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-04-18· cited 13×
• Lester v. Lester
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-07-14· cited 10×
• Sealander v. Sealander
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-05-30· cited 8×
• Wilkes v. Wilkes
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-09-01· cited 5×
• Gomez v. Gomez
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-06-23· cited 3×