Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1/31/2002
Ford v. Ford
Citations
- 65 S.W.3d 432
- 347 Ark. 485
- 2002 Ark. LEXIS 52
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the exceptions identified in Rule 2 specify circumstances in which an issue is appealable even though the order is not final
- holding that the exceptions identified in Rule 2 specify circumstances in which an issue is appealable even though the order is not final
- holding that Rule 2(d) permits an appeal from any order that is final as to the issue of custody, regardless of bwhether the order resolves all other issues
- holding that Rule 2(d) permits an appeal from any order that is final as to the issue of custody, regardless of whether the order resolves all other issues
- holding that Rule 2(d) permits an appeal from any order that is final as to the issue of custody, regardless of whether the order resolves all other issues
- holding that Rule 2(d) permits an appeal from any order that is final as to the issue of custody, regardless of whether the order resolves all other issues
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Annabelle Clinton Imber
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
75 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Lewellyn v. LewellynSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2002-12-19· cited 59×
- Stehle v. ZimmerebnerSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2009-01-30· cited 58×
- Baber v. BaberSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2011-02-09· cited 47×
- Evans v. TillerySupreme Court of Arkansas· 2005-03-03· cited 33×
- Cole v. ColeCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 2005-01-05· cited 32×
- Lenders Title Co. v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2003-05-22· cited 32×
- In the Interest of P.C.S.Court of Appeals of Texas· 2010-08-12· cited 31×
- Hall v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2013-09-19· cited 29×
- Brown v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2012-03-01· cited 27×
- Stacks v. MarksSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2003-10-30· cited 23×
- Riddick v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 2016-09-21· cited 20×
- Grimsley v. DrewyorCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 2019-04-17· cited 20×
- Dansby v. DansbyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 2004-06-30· cited 19×
- Walker v. TorresCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 2003-09-24· cited 19×
- In Re Implementation of the Revised Administrative Order No. 10Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2020-04-02· cited 19×
- Chitwood v. ChitwoodCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 2005-06-29· cited 17×
- Bamburg v. BamburgCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 2011-09-21· cited 15×
- Lasché v. LevinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2009-08-06· cited 13×
- Hardy v. WilbourneSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2007-06-21· cited 13×
- Martin v. ScharborCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 2006-04-12· cited 12×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2001-06-21· cited 55×
- McWhorter v. McWhorterSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2001-11-08· cited 49×
- Skokos v. SkokosSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2001-04-19· cited 48×
- Kelly v. KellySupreme Court of Arkansas· 2000-06-08· cited 37×
- Norwood v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1993-12-06· cited 31×
- Fonken v. FonkenSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1998-10-29· cited 29×
- Hertz Corp. v. RobineauTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1999-11-04· cited 25×
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1999-05-27· cited 25×
- Mearns v. MearnsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 1997-06-04· cited 19×
- Haase v. StarnesSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1999-04-08· cited 15×
- Larscheid v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2001-02-01· cited 13×
- Halter v. HalterCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 1998-01-28· cited 13×
- East Poinsett County School District No. 14 v. MasseySupreme Court of Arkansas· 1994-05-31· cited 11×
- Watanabe v. WebbSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1995-05-01· cited 6×
- Milum v. MilumCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 1995-03-15· cited 5×
- Rowlett v. BuntonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 1999-12-08· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.