Skip to main content
· 5/4/1935

Ford v. City of Kinsley

Citations

  • 141 Kan. 877
  • 44 P.2d 255

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a plaintiff alleging nursing malpractice was required to present evidence concerning the applicable standard of care and that the plaintiff \could do so only through an expert's testimony\
  • noting that the plaintiff was required to present expert testimony to establish the standard of care applicable to the nursing staff involved in the litigation
  • explaining that a trial court necessarily abuses its discretion if it makes an error of law
  • explaining that “the party proposing to call an expert bears the burden to show that his or her expert meets [the requisite statutory] qualifications.”
  • noting that a plaintiff alleging nursing malpractice was required to present evidence concerning the applicable standard of care and that the plaintiff “could do so only through an expert’s testimony.”
  • explaining what constitutes active clinical practice and instruction sufficient to meet the statutory requirements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dawson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.