Skip to main content
· 11/3/1934

Ford v. City of Hutchinson

Citations

  • 140 Kan. 307
  • 37 P.2d 39
  • 1934 Kan. LEXIS 61

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a party may not recover damages that are speculative or premised on conjecture
  • “[I]nterest for a complaint filed in August 2008 would be calculated in February -11- 2009.”
  • “A finding is clearly erroneous if there is no evidentiary support for it or if this Court is left with a definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.”
  • “For example, interest for a complaint filed in August 2008 would be calculated in February 2009 using the January 1, 2009, rate, and would be calculated again in August 2009, using the July 1, 2009, rate.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dawson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.