Ford Roofing Products Co. v. Servatius

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying this distinction to nearly identical statutory language in Section 3133(b)(2) to parse when notice is timely given
• whether materials were supplied for repairs or as part of the original contract is a question of fact subject to review under the “clearly erroneous” standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).