· 7/19/1994
Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Russell
Citations
- 519 N.W.2d 460
- 24 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 687
- 1994 Minn. App. LEXIS 684
- 1994 WL 372764
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that advertisement containing financing terms was not a binding offer because not everyone qualified for financing
- holding sale of collateral at auction for wholesale dealers was presumed to be commercially reasonable
- “Because appellants failed to provide some specific evidence of commercial unreasonableness in the method of sale, summary judgment was proper.”
- “[I]if goods are advertised for sale at a certain price, it is not an offer and no contract is formed; [it] is merely an invitation to bargain rather than an offer.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kalitowski, Huspeni, Amundson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.