Skip to main content
· 7/19/1994

Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Russell

Citations

  • 519 N.W.2d 460
  • 24 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 687
  • 1994 Minn. App. LEXIS 684
  • 1994 WL 372764

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that advertisement containing financing terms was not a binding offer because not everyone qualified for financing
  • holding sale of collateral at auction for wholesale dealers was presumed to be commercially reasonable
  • “Because appellants failed to provide some specific evidence of commercial unreasonableness in the method of sale, summary judgment was proper.”
  • “[I]if goods are advertised for sale at a certain price, it is not an offer and no contract is formed; [it] is merely an invitation to bargain rather than an offer.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kalitowski, Huspeni, Amundson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.