· 3/15/1971
Ford Motor Company v. Reid
Citations
- 465 S.W.2d 80
- 250 Ark. 176
- 8 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 985
- 1971 Ark. LEXIS 1237
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “If the Ford Motor Company intended the repair remedy to be exclusive, as it now contends, it should have stated that intention in express language”
- limitations which are exclusive must clearly be stated to be such
- faulty wiring causing fire in automobile
- faulty wiring causing fire in automobile
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Byrd
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.