Ford Motor Company v. Gibson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial court did not abuse discretion in rehabilitating jurors who expressed general distrust of corporations but unequivocally expressed no bias toward either party in the case
• noting that “the time period within which the trial court was required to hold a hearing and rule on the [OCGA § 24-9-67.1] motion had already passed”
• trial court did not abuse its discretion in imposing lesser discovery sanction when it could have imposed the ultimate sanction of default
• trial court did not err in denying motion to exclude expert testimony when time period within which defendant was entitled to hearing and ruling on its motion had passed
• motion to exclude expert testimony filed several months after final pretrial conference was untimely

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).