N.D. Texas· 3/8/2017
Ford Motor Co. v. Versata Software, Inc.
Citations
- 316 F. Supp. 3d 925
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- indicating that the “reasonable particularity requirement [in Rule 34(b)] should apply with no less force to a subpoena’s document requests to a non-party”
- denying defendant’s request for protective order under Rule 26(c)(1) where defendant did not articulate a specific need for the order but instead only argued that the discovery sought was irrelevant
- denying the party’s request to modify or terminate a protective order entered by another court when no effort was made to file a motion with the entering court to modify or terminate its order
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Horan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court· 1984-05-21· cited 1,798×
- Frank Landry v. Air Line Pilots Association International Afl-Cio, Taca Airlines, S.A. And Charles J. HuttingerFifth Circuit· 1990-04-27· cited 315×
- In Re Terra International, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1998-01-27· cited 303×
- Wiwa v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co.Fifth Circuit· 2004-12-22· cited 240×
- Truswal Systems Corp. v. Hydro-Air Engineering, Inc.Federal Circuit· 1987-03-11· cited 186×
- Jacqueline M. Harris, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Intervenor-Appellant v. Amoco Production Co.Fifth Circuit· 1985-08-16· cited 142×
- Micro Motion, Incorporated v. Kane Steel Co., Inc., Cross/appellantFederal Circuit· 1990-01-24· cited 129×
- Deus v. Allstate InsuranceFifth Circuit· 1994-03-08· cited 123×
- Heller v. City of DallasN.D. Texas· 2014-11-12· cited 119×
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. BradyN.D. Texas· 2006-10-16· cited 91×
- Merrill v. Waffle House, Inc.N.D. Texas· 2005-03-22· cited 65×
- Williams v. City of DallasN.D. Texas· 1998-03-05· cited 59×
- Maria Cazorla v. Koch Foods of Mississippi, LLCFifth Circuit· 2016-09-27· cited 52×
- Tucker v. Ohtsu Tire & Rubber Co.D. Maryland· 2000-02-18· cited 30×
- American Federation of Musicians v. Skodam Films, LLCN.D. Texas· 2015-12-03· cited 23×
- Dushkin Publishing Group, Inc. v. Kinko's Service Corp.District of Columbia· 1991-05-22· cited 16×
- Isenberg v. Chase Bank USA, N.A.N.D. Texas· 2009-07-14· cited 9×
- LeBlanc v. BroyhillW.D. North Carolina· 1988-12-14· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.