Skip to main content
· 6/29/2007

Ford Motor Co. v. Rushford

Citations

  • 868 N.E.2d 806
  • 2007 Ind. LEXIS 497
  • 2007 WL 1874258

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that product liability actions for negligence and strict liability necessitate the plaintiff to prove proximate cause
  • holding that product liability actions for negligence and strict liability necessitate the plaintiff to prove proximate cause
  • listing duty and breach of duty among the elements a plaintiff must prove to prevail in a negligence claim
  • stating the plaintiff is required to prove a duty owed by the defendant, a breach of that duty, and injury proximately caused by the breach to prevail on a claim of negligence
  • stating the plaintiff is required to prove a duty owed by the defendant, a breach of that duty, and injury proximately caused by the breach to prevail on a claim of negligence
  • including proximate causation among the elements of negligence and strict products liability

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boehm, Dickson, Rucker, Shepard, Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.