· 6/29/2007
Ford Motor Co. v. Rushford
Citations
- 868 N.E.2d 806
- 2007 Ind. LEXIS 497
- 2007 WL 1874258
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that product liability actions for negligence and strict liability necessitate the plaintiff to prove proximate cause
- holding that product liability actions for negligence and strict liability necessitate the plaintiff to prove proximate cause
- listing duty and breach of duty among the elements a plaintiff must prove to prevail in a negligence claim
- stating the plaintiff is required to prove a duty owed by the defendant, a breach of that duty, and injury proximately caused by the breach to prevail on a claim of negligence
- stating the plaintiff is required to prove a duty owed by the defendant, a breach of that duty, and injury proximately caused by the breach to prevail on a claim of negligence
- including proximate causation among the elements of negligence and strict products liability
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Boehm, Dickson, Rucker, Shepard, Sullivan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.