Ford Motor Co. v. Hill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “analysis of whether a product is in a defective condition unreasonably dangerous to the user involves a negligence analysis in a ‘design defect' case, unlike the analysis ordinarily required in a 'manufacturing flaw' situation”
• rejecting the argument that only a negligence standard should apply to design defect claims
• although original complaint did not allege strict liability count, the issue was tried by implied consent of all parties

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).