Ford Motor Co. v. Ford

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noticing that half of the jurors had been exposed to the allegedly prejudicial information
• noting that examination must be probative on the issue of impartiality
• also finding relevant the fact that the “information was precisely the type specifically excluded by the district court during trial”
• district court relied too heavily on jurors' assurances of impartiality

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).