Skip to main content
· 6/9/2006

Ford Motor Co. v. Cross

Citations

  • 441 F. Supp. 2d 837
  • 65 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 868
  • 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73946
  • 2006 WL 1889927

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that while a plaintiff’s well-pleaded allegations as to liability are taken as true when a defendant is in default, the same is not true for damages (citation omitted)
  • explaining that a use of a 27 domain name is “legitimate” if it is “for some purpose other than simply to profit from the value 1 of the trademark”
  • finding the defendants’ trademark infringement to be deliberate where they continued to use the plaintiff’s marks despite receipt of notice that their actions were unauthorized
  • ordering the defendants to disclose all other domain registrations held by them and to transfer registration of a particular domain name to plaintiff in part under authority of 15 U.S.C. § 1116(a)
  • ordering defendants to disclose all other domain registrations they held and to transfer registration of a particular domain name to plaintiff partly under authority of 15 U.S.C. § 1116(a)
  • ordering the defendants to disclose all other domain registrations held by them and to transfer registration of a particular domain name to plaintiff in part under authority of 15 U.S.C. section 1116(a)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cleland, Scheer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.