Ford Lumber & Mfg. Co. v. Asher

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that lifecare planner “certainly assumed” that physician he relied on was correct, and that incorrect assumptions provided counsel with an opportunity for cross-examination but did not render analysis inadmissible
• finding no error in admitting expert testimony of lifecare planner who relied on physiatrist’s opinions even if those opinions were inadmissible hearsay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).