Skip to main content
· 5/28/1926

Ford Hydro-Electric Co. v. Neely

Citations

  • 13 F.2d 361
  • 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 3570

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “[a]n individual no longer in custody may employ the rarely-used writ of coram nobis to make a Sixth Amendment assistance of counsel attack on his conviction”
  • explaining that “[a]n individ- ual no longer in custody may employ the rarely-used writ of coram nobis to make a Sixth Amendment assistance of coun- sel attack on his conviction”
  • explaining that “[a]n individ- ual no longer in custody may employ the rarely-used writ of coram nobis to make a Sixth Amendment assistance of coun- sel attack on his conviction”
  • using this example from Allen to demonstrate the difference between Cuyler’s “adverse effect” element and a requirement that defendant show prejudice
  • a defendant “may 20 employ the rarely used writ of coram nobis to make a Sixth Amendment assistance of 21 counsel attack on his conviction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Evans

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.