Ford Consumer Finance Co. v. Maddaloni (In Re Maddaloni)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding anti-modification provision does not apply to a claim secured by a multi-unit property in which only one of the units is the debtor’s principal residence
• “[T]he use of ‘is’ without any modifier (e.g., ‘in whole’ or ‘in part’) does not evince an intent by Congress to apply the antimodification provision to real property that includes, but is more than, a debtor’s residence.”
• “[T]he use of ‘is’ without any modifier (e.g., ‘in whole’ or ‘in part’) does not evince an intent by Congress to apply the antimodification provision to real property that includes, but is more than, a debtor’s residence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).