Skip to main content
· 11/13/2000

Forcier v. Microsoft Corp.

Citations

  • 123 F. Supp. 2d 520
  • 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17861
  • 2000 WL 1804600

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining trade secrets were \related\ in part because duties giving rise to misappropriation claim arose through \one relationship\
  • granting summary judgment because plaintiff 25 admittedly suspected wrongdoing six years before filing suit
  • “The alleged trade secrets at issue all are related because they were developed for use in the same sophisticated and highly specialized product.”
  • alleged trade secret was pub- lished in a patent application filed by the plaintiff
  • alleged trade secret was pub- lished in a patent application filed by the plaintiff

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Armstrong

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.