Skip to main content
· 11/20/2006

Forcier Ex Rel. Estate of Forcier v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Citations

  • 469 F.3d 178
  • 39 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1620
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 28686
  • 2006 WL 3350740

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that federal common law \requires that we accord [a contract's] unambiguous language its plain and ordinary meaning\
  • describing how a facility-of-payment clause “puts both the policy-holder and the participant on notice that, in the absence of a beneficiary designation, payment by [the insurer] to any member(s) of an enumerated class ‘will discharge [the company’s] liability for the amount so paid’ ”
  • “Met-Life contracted for an extremely free hand in deciding to whom ... the policy’s proceeds would be paid in the absence of a designated beneficiary.”
  • “MetLife contracted for an extremely free hand in deciding to whom . . . the policy’s proceeds would be paid in the absence of a designated beneficiary.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Selya, Siler, Howard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.