Skip to main content
· 5/3/1988

Forbes v. St. Mark's Hospital

Citations

  • 754 P.2d 933
  • 81 Utah Adv. Rep. 18
  • 1988 Utah LEXIS 46
  • 1988 WL 43372

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the filing of a notice of intent tolls UHMA's statute of repose
  • statutory construction is a question of law, which is reviewed for correctness
  • statutory construction is a question of law which is reviewed for correctness
  • “[W]e follow the well-accepted rules of statutory construction that the provisions must be harmonized with the legislative intent and purpose and that the more specific provisions ... take precedence over and control the more general provisions.... ”
  • no deference need be given to trial court's statutory interpretation
  • no deference need be given to trial court’s statutory interpretation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hall, Howe, Stewart, Durham, Zimmerman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.