Skip to main content
· 7/1/1881

Forbes v. Reilly

Citations

  • 57 Cal. 302

Syllabus

<p>Outside Lands—Sab Ebancisco—Res Judicata.—A parcel of the lands granted to San Eranciseo hy Act of Congress of March 8th, 1866, had heen awarded to T., as successor of defendant R. The plaintiff, claiming to he himself the successor of R., sued T., R., and the city; and obtained a decree directing the city to convey to plaintiff instead of R., which was done. R. having ejected plaintiff, this action was brought for possession; and defendant claimed that said deed was void, because neither plaintiff nor his predecessors had complied with certain requirements of said act. Meld, that the defense was inadmissible.</p>

Judges: McKiestby

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.