Forbes v. Jenney Manufacturing Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that there was no prejudice to parties where parties failed to oppose non-party’s motion to intervene
• finding that the putative intervenor would be prejudiced by the denial of its motion because the plaintiff had minimal interest in pursuing any recovery regarding the loans at issue
• noting, with respect to the prejudice analysis, that it was significant that the motion to intervene was unopposed
• granting motion to intervene where there would be a risk of inconsistent rulings on the same issues
• “With respect to prejudice to existing parties, it is significant that there has been no opposition to [the] motion to intervene.”
• motion to intervene timely when discovery had not yet begun

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).