Wyoming Supreme Court· 11/29/1983
Forbes v. Forbes
Citations
- 672 P.2d 428
- 1983 Wyo. LEXIS 388
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “It is well settled that the district court is not bound to accept a stipulation of the parties and that the court’s major consideration in determining custody of minor children is the welfare of those children.”
- \It is well settled that the district court is not bound to accept a stipulation of the parties and that the court's major consideration in determining custody of minor children is the welfare of those children.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rooney, C.J., and Thomas, Rose, Brown and Cardine
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Reavis v. ReavisWyoming Supreme Court· 1998-03-20· cited 75×
- Gurney v. GurneyWyoming Supreme Court· 1995-07-18· cited 52×
- Fanning v. FanningWyoming Supreme Court· 1986-04-10· cited 36×
- Tyler R. Kimzey v. Shelby K. KimzeyWyoming Supreme Court· 2020-04-22· cited 29×
- Fink v. FinkWyoming Supreme Court· 1984-08-07· cited 24×
- Booth v. BoothWyoming Supreme Court· 2019-01-14· cited 23×
- Deen v. DeenWyoming Supreme Court· 1989-05-25· cited 21×
- Jacobs v. JacobsWyoming Supreme Court· 1995-05-10· cited 21×
- Vanessa Taulo-Millar v. Kormakur HognasonWyoming Supreme Court· 2022-01-14· cited 20×
- Amy Elise Evans f/k/a Amy Elise Sharpe v. Spencer Steven SharpeWyoming Supreme Court· 2023-06-06· cited 17×
- Eickbush v. EickbushWyoming Supreme Court· 2007-11-09· cited 16×
- Esquibel v. EsquibelWyoming Supreme Court· 1996-06-03· cited 5×
- Js v. MbWyoming Supreme Court· 2010-08-10
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Yates v. YatesMississippi Supreme Court· 1973-10-15· cited 55×
- Ayling v. AylingWyoming Supreme Court· 1983-04-22· cited 39×
- Manley v. ManleyLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1980-12-15· cited 14×
- Grosz v. GroszWyoming Supreme Court· 1973-02-13· cited 11×
- Lawrence v. LawrenceWyoming Supreme Court· 1981-05-21· cited 5×
- Rittenberry v. RittenberryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1979-09-21· cited 1×
Other cases named Forbes v. Forbes
12 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- Forbes v. ForbesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1953-06-04· cited 17×
- Forbes v. ForbesCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1968-07-22· cited 14×
- Forbes v. ForbesSupreme Court of Virginia· 1944-05-01· cited 11×
- Forbes v. ForbesIndiana Court of Appeals· 1993-03-24· cited 7×
- Forbes v. ForbesMissouri Court of Appeals· 1999-02-23· cited 7×
- Forbes v. ForbesMissouri Court of Appeals· 2004-04-27· cited 6×
- Forbes v. ForbesSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1856-04-15· cited 3×
- Forbes v. ForbesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1946-06-18· cited 2×
- Forbes v. ForbesIllinois Supreme Court· 1913-12-17· cited 2×
- Forbes v. ForbesNew York Supreme Court· 1893-05-12
- Forbes v. ForbesNinth Circuit· 1935-08-19
- Forbes v. ForbesMichigan Supreme Court· 1897-05-11
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.