Skip to main content
· 6/30/1952

Forbes v. First Camden National Bank & Trust Co.

Citations

  • 21 N.J. Super. 133
  • 90 A.2d 547
  • 1952 N.J. Super. LEXIS 778

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defendant had superior knowledge that a comparison between a voice exemplar containing his voice and the voice on an incriminating intercepted phone call would establish that it was not the defendant’s voice on the intercepted call

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sheehan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.