· 12/19/2003
Forbes Inc. v. Granada Biosciences, Inc.
Citations
- 124 S.W.3d 167
- 32 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1498
- 47 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 162
- 2003 Tex. LEXIS 524
- 2003 WL 22999362
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining essential elements of business disparagement as “(1) the defendant published false and disparaging information about it, (2) with malice, (3) without privilege, (4
- listing elements as the publication of false and disparaging information with malice, and without privilege, causing special damages
- “More than a scintilla of evidence exists if it would allow reasonable and fair-minded people to differ in their conclusions.”
- reckless disregard requires plaintiff to show that defendant had serious doubts about the truth of the alleged defamatory statement or high degree of awareness that it was likely false
- “A business disparagement claim is similar in many respects to a defamation action.”
- business-disparagement claim requires proof of “special damages to the plaintiff”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: O'Neill, Phillips, Hecht, Owen, Jefferson, Smith, Wainwright, Brister, Schneider
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.