Skip to main content
· 12/19/2003

Forbes Inc. v. Granada Biosciences, Inc.

Citations

  • 124 S.W.3d 167
  • 32 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1498
  • 47 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 162
  • 2003 Tex. LEXIS 524
  • 2003 WL 22999362

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining essential elements of business disparagement as “(1) the defendant published false and disparaging information about it, (2) with malice, (3) without privilege, (4
  • listing elements as the publication of false and disparaging information with malice, and without privilege, causing special damages
  • “More than a scintilla of evidence exists if it would allow reasonable and fair-minded people to differ in their conclusions.”
  • reckless disregard requires plaintiff to show that defendant had serious doubts about the truth of the alleged defamatory statement or high degree of awareness that it was likely false
  • “A business disparagement claim is similar in many respects to a defamation action.”
  • business-disparagement claim requires proof of “special damages to the plaintiff”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: O'Neill, Phillips, Hecht, Owen, Jefferson, Smith, Wainwright, Brister, Schneider

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.